Talk:HawkOnFire/Understanding HawkOnFire

From Robowiki
Revision as of 02:16, 18 November 2007 by Starrynte (talk | contribs) (New page: == From the Old Wiki == {{CreditForOldWikiArticle | oldpage=MeleeStrategy/UnderstandingHawkOnFire | author=Kawigi - hopefully also looked over/edited by Rozu }} Great. Haven't rea...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

From the Old Wiki

Credits - HawkOnFire/Understanding HawkOnFire
Old wiki page: MeleeStrategy/UnderstandingHawkOnFire
Original author(s): Kawigi - hopefully also looked over/edited by Rozu

Great. Haven't read it yet, but I just must comment one of the first statement - "I think it's been on everyone's todo list to take a look at it." Ha! I have never even considered taking a look at it until this page came up. Now though I just might. Just need to fail in a few attempts at melee movements myself first. -- PEZ

I rather read pages like this than to look at the code. When looking at the code, I just see the code. When reading a description like above, I form my own ideas and try to implement them the way I see fit. Ofcourse once in a while I also copy things (like teamcommunication, circular targeting) but I still try to adapt and improve them to my needs. This is yet another excellent page. I wish that I could a) write such clear and informative page and b) write such sophisticated and competetive bot. -- GrubbmGait

Code or prose. Not too much difference for me (as long as the code is somewhat readable). It's just that I don't want to get to "coloured" by other peoples ideas before I try myself. I want to get those "ahhhh!" feels when I later try look at how people have approached the problems I have stumbled across. -- PEZ

I do not know if this has been said yet, but welcome back kawigi. Good to see you around the game still. -- jim

Nice page! I don't think that I have something to edit here. But anyway, I'm open to answer any questions as required. -- rozu

You cannot post new threads to this discussion page because it has been protected from new threads, or you do not currently have permission to edit.

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Extra 50 bytes as mentioned:023:03, 2 September 2013

Extra 50 bytes as mentioned:

In the page, there was an extra 50 bytes to use. Maybe some linear targeting would help. I'm not sure.

BeastBots (talk)23:03, 2 September 2013