Thread history

From Talk:BeepBoop
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
03:25, 24 June 2021 Xor (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
17:50, 23 June 2021 Kev (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
03:21, 23 June 2021 Xor (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
02:52, 23 June 2021 Xor (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
20:23, 22 June 2021 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
19:22, 22 June 2021 Kev (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
18:55, 21 June 2021 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
01:24, 15 June 2021 Xor (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
00:19, 15 June 2021 Kev (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
00:11, 15 June 2021 Kev (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
05:35, 13 June 2021 Rednaxela (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
17:11, 12 June 2021 GrubbmGait (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Congratulations on 100% PWin!)
04:04, 12 June 2021 Xor (talk | contribs) New thread created  

Congratulations on 100% PWin!

I’ve been long wondering where the bar of top bots are, now BeepBoop proved that there’s still much to do here! Congratulations on the surprising result! May be I could start a new bot as well soon!

Xor (talk)04:04, 12 June 2021

For me it is not the 100% win, others achieved that too over time. It is the very dominant win, only 2 bots score better than 40%, and the gigantic survival, only 1 bot survives 30%. I have experimented with bulletpower, but never managed to get a real advantage with it. It seems however that the aggressive conservative way (whats in a name) of BeepBoop does pay off.

GrubbmGait (talk)17:11, 12 June 2021

Yeah, after this one I will do an experimental release with more standard energy management to see how much BeepBoop's is making a difference.

--Kev (talk)00:11, 15 June 2021
 

My experience is that everything is dependent, score is some "multiplication" of everything. With top class guns and top class wave surfing, tuning energy management gives a lot gain when it isn't done right, so does tuning bandwidth, bullet shadow, etc. But with different guns, and different wave surfing algorithms, the optimal of everything else is different, so past tuning gets outdated very soon.

Anyway, the most gain always come from: 1. Fixing some significant weakness 2. Adding some big feature, e.g. Wave Surfing 3. Getting everything in 1 and 2 right.

Xor (talk)01:24, 15 June 2021
 

Aye! Nicely done Kev! Seeing some of this sort of activity and similar kinda makes me feel tempted to come back to Robocode some time :)

Rednaxela (talk)05:35, 13 June 2021
 

Thanks everyone :). My theory is that "optimal" bots would be so good at dodging that there's nothing better than random targeting (taking into account walls, game physics, etc) against them. Certainly as bots get better hit rates go down, but I think there's a long way to go before bots are at that point.

--Kev (talk)00:19, 15 June 2021

DrussGT has a random gun as backup just in case some optimal bot does get invented ;) Unfortunately, it seems it has a weakness in the bullet power selection. I'll have to take a look at that...

Skilgannon (talk)18:55, 21 June 2021

Looking at DrussGT's virtual gun scores, the random gun does surprisingly close to the other ones against top surfers! The learned weights for BeepBoop's anti-surfer gun (1) put a lot of emphasis on wall features, (2) put basically no weight on historical features like time since decel, and (3) puts basically no weight on recency of the wave. This makes me wonder if BeepBoop's anti-surfer gun mostly acts as a slightly better random gun that is better at handling walls rather than something that learns patterns in the other bot's movement.

--Kev (talk)19:22, 22 June 2021

Well, DrussGT's random gun does take maximum reachable angles into account, which is probably 80% of wall effects. However there's probably something there about bots being hesitant to get closer to the enemy, even if they could potentially reach a further angle, which skews the distribution away from the reachable angles which are affected by walls. It would be interesting to do something with this hypothesis, but for me the random gun is really there as an emergency backup against someone simulating DrussGT's gun or something similar.

Skilgannon (talk)20:23, 22 June 2021
 

I had some strange experiment result. My guns are constantly doing worse than random against top surfers (oh no), but whenever I switch to some real random gun, it only decreased my score. Maybe a learning gun gives better bullet shadow? There's little study how guns affects bullet shadowing since its passive. Maybe adding some "active" thing to random gun helps.

Xor (talk)02:52, 23 June 2021

As long as both bots are using the same firepower, bullet collisions don't help you much: you don't get hit, but also you don't hit the opponent! So I thought a bit about adding active bullet shadowing to BeepBoop, but decided it wassn't worth the effort. I guess it could still help you situationally if for the moment your chance of hitting is lower than the opponent's. For example, if you are stuck near a wall, maybe you could create a shadow to cover your escape from the wall, but it would be complicated. Also for this reason, maybe hit rate should really be measured as hits / (shots - collisions), although getting this statistic for virtual guns isn't possible. If you are measuring hit rate as hits / shots, it could look like your random gun is better when really it just isn't creating as many bullet collisions.

--Kev (talk)17:50, 23 June 2021
 

And I guess BeepBoop's AS gun works pretty well not because its some better random, but rather most surfers have significant weakness near walls. They generally weight distance very high to prevent getting too close (future risk), but essentially making them weak at dodging bullets near this scenario. Some repeated patterns exist because they learned the hit but still get to the same position.

Xor (talk)03:21, 23 June 2021