Thread history

From Talk:Diamond/Version History
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
16:57, 26 September 2011 Jdev (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 1.6.x PL brags)
14:24, 26 September 2011 Voidious (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 1.6.x PL brags)
05:08, 26 September 2011 Jdev (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 1.6.x PL brags)
05:02, 26 September 2011 Voidious (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (oops, 3.29? ...)
02:42, 26 September 2011 Voidious (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 1.6.x PL brags)
18:55, 25 September 2011 Voidious (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 1.6.x PL brags)
18:52, 25 September 2011 Jdev (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 1.6.x PL brags)
18:36, 25 September 2011 Voidious (talk | contribs) New thread created  

1.6.x PL brags

While the RoboRumble results don't bear much evidence, I'm quite happy with the progress I've made against top bots recently (while maintaining or increasing APS!). I mainly focus on Shadow and DrussGT, but also against a test bed that includes 6 other strong bots. I swapped out Scarlet for Tomcat because at least twice I saw a score of 85-90 (adaptive bullet power gone haywire?).

    abc.Shadow 3.83c
    darkcanuck.Pris 0.92
    davidalves.Phoenix 1.02
    jk.mega.DrussGT 2.2.0
    kc.serpent.WaveSerpent 2.11
    lxx.Tomcat 3.17.169
    mue.Ascendant 1.2.27
    voidious.Dookious 1.573cNDS (non-data saving)

Results over 100 seasons (plus an extra 200 of 1.6.12 vs Shadow / DrussGT):

Diamond Shadow Pris Phoenix DrussGT WaveSerpent Tomcat Ascendant Dookious Avg Seasons
v1.6.4 50.20 51.43 56.41 45.74 52.06 58.94 56.05 51.58 52.80 100
v1.6.12 52.46 60.74 61.13 49.30 57.45 58.66 62.81 58.60 57.64 150
Voidious18:36, 25 September 2011

There are very strange results for Tomcat's last version, but his aps against Druss and Diamond is about 50% now

Jdev18:52, 25 September 2011
 

Congrats! Did you test it or just looking at the Rumble? 2-3 battles isn't very accurate... But I should update DrussGT and Tomcat to latest versions in any case.

Voidious18:55, 25 September 2011
 

FYI:

  • 100 battles vs Tomcat 3.27: 54.15
  • 300 battles vs DrussGT 2.2.2: 49.00

Edit: Oops, Tomcat's at 3.29? Doh!

Voidious02:42, 26 September 2011
 

I lost 7-8 places with the latest version, so congratulations are not appropriate in this situation:) No i did not test, but now there're 9 battles and APS is still about 50%:) And yes, i did my previous post to encourage you to get last version of Tomcat:) Good luck with PM crown hunting:)

Jdev05:08, 26 September 2011
 

FYI, take 2 - 100 battles vs Tomcat 3.29: 52.89. Very nice work!

Voidious14:24, 26 September 2011
 

Thank you, but for me is better -5 APS vs Diamond, but + 1 APS overall:)

Jdev16:57, 26 September 2011