Thread history

From Talk:DrussGT/Version History
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
09:41, 9 February 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
09:39, 9 February 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
04:54, 29 January 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
04:53, 29 January 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
16:55, 17 January 2014 Chase-san (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
14:46, 17 January 2014 MN (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
05:19, 17 January 2014 Rednaxela (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
02:39, 17 January 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
02:33, 17 January 2014 MN (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
02:05, 17 January 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
20:37, 16 January 2014 Straw (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
17:51, 16 January 2014 Voidious (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (typo)
17:50, 16 January 2014 Voidious (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
14:56, 16 January 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
14:13, 16 January 2014 MN (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
14:09, 16 January 2014 MN (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
18:23, 15 January 2014 Chase-san (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
09:43, 15 January 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
09:18, 15 January 2014 Chase-san (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
00:51, 15 January 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
21:17, 14 January 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
14:19, 14 January 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
08:08, 14 January 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
02:20, 14 January 2014 MN (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
02:03, 14 January 2014 Voidious (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
01:36, 14 January 2014 Straw (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
22:34, 25 December 2013 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
18:17, 25 December 2013 Tmservo (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
09:05, 25 December 2013 Straw (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
08:04, 25 December 2013 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
00:16, 25 December 2013 Straw (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3)
23:17, 24 December 2013 Tmservo (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
22:37, 24 December 2013 Tmservo (talk | contribs) New thread created  

3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3

Edited by author.
Last edit: 18:17, 25 December 2013

Which one is better Edit:found out that 3.1.3DC uses GoTo surfing

Tmservo (talk)22:37, 24 December 2013

Both 3.13 and 3.13DC use GoTo surfing. 3.13DC uses DC, while 3.13 uses some form of VCS. (Correct me if I am wrong)

Straw (talk)00:16, 25 December 2013

Correct :-) In the movement, to be more specific.

And considering I write a changelog, I don't see how this question is anything other than lazy at its worst.

Skilgannon (talk)08:04, 25 December 2013

I was always wondering why the best bot used VCS, DC seems much more elegant. Does it improve performance in your tests?

Straw (talk)09:05, 25 December 2013

For some reason I've never managed to get the DC to perform as well as the VCS, so it still used VCS. I remember Jdev commenting that a range search worked better for him than a KNN search in movement, so I'll be trying that next.

Skilgannon (talk)22:34, 25 December 2013

Have you tried doing something similar to your many randomized attribute buffers with kD-Trees? You could make 100 trees, each with a random subset of the predictors, then combine the results. You could even start weighting some tree's results higher if they perform better.

Straw (talk)01:36, 14 January 2014
 

DC is more versatile than VCS. There is more room for improvement, but also more room to screw up. And WaveSim doesn't work with movement.

It is harder to unlock all the potential from DC in movement.

MN (talk)02:20, 14 January 2014