Thread history
From Talk:Insomnia
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Viewing a history listing
| Time | User | Activity | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17:05, 21 July 2017 | Dsekercioglu (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Wow!) |
| 15:44, 21 July 2017 | GrubbmGait (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Wow!) |
| 12:14, 21 July 2017 | Dsekercioglu (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Wow!) |
| 12:06, 21 July 2017 | Dsekercioglu (talk | contribs) | New thread created |
Targeting the opposite corner is a good idea. Many bots go to the corner and there are 11 bots. Maybe it can use a head-on or a linear gun when there are less bots to increase the hitting probability.
Dsekercioglu (talk)
But it would be worser against a minimum risk mover. They try to dodge head-on, linear, circular targeting but they don't dodge opposite corner targeting.
Dsekercioglu (talk)
Basic minimum risk mover does not care about targeting, it just wants to flee to the position with the least risk. With other words, away from any opponent.
GrubbmGait (talk)
I meant, sometimes they also dodge bullets. Opposite corner is better minimum risk bots who doesn't dodge bullets. It is also better than HOT against others because bots don't dodge opposite corner targeting.
Dsekercioglu (talk)
