Thread history
Viewing a history listing
| Time | User | Activity | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03:45, 17 February 2012 | Jdev (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Your's uploads have suspicious APS for Tomcat) |
| 17:27, 16 February 2012 | Rednaxela (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Your's uploads have suspicious APS for Tomcat) |
| 10:45, 16 February 2012 | FatalFlaw (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Your's uploads have suspicious APS for Tomcat) |
| 10:26, 16 February 2012 | FatalFlaw (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Your's uploads have suspicious APS for Tomcat) |
| 04:56, 16 February 2012 | Jdev (talk | contribs) | New thread created |
Hi! Your's uploads have suspicious APS for Tomcat
- lxx.Tomcat 3.55 VS voidious.mini.Komarious 1.88
- lxx.Tomcat 3.55 VS "baal.nano.N 1.42
- lxx.Tomcat 3.55 VS gf.Centaur.Centaur 0.6.7
Which java version you use?
java -version java version "1.6.0_20" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.9.10) (6b20-1.9.10-0ubuntu1~10.10.3) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.0-b09, mixed mode)
I'll stop running roborumble for now and switch to an offical java version instead of openJDK before running it again.
Thanks
Hmm, just a note, I'd be doubtful OpenJDK is the issue. I always run OpenJDK and have never had a problem with robots not running correctly in all the time I have used it in the rumble. I suspect the actual problem may be something different (i.e. maybe something about the specific robocode install?)
Because I doubt the issue is OpenJDK, would you be able test your robocode install with lxx.Tomcat 3.55 specifically with both versions of Java on your machine? If the problem exists in both, perhaps you could zip up your robocode install and upload it somewhere so some of us could see if something in the install is being weird?
