Thread history

From User talk:MN
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
22:54, 23 June 2013 MN (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Custom client bug)
21:40, 23 June 2013 Sheldor (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (minor edit)
21:34, 23 June 2013 Sheldor (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Custom client bug)
18:20, 23 June 2013 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Custom client bug)
18:11, 23 June 2013 MN (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
18:11, 23 June 2013 MN (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Custom client bug)
18:50, 22 June 2013 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New thread created  

Custom client bug

Just to let you know, your client is uploading bots with codesize 250 (UnterBot, Spiral, xbots), to the nanorumble, when only 249 and less should be there.

Skilgannon (talk)18:50, 22 June 2013

To make sure:

- nanobots are 0 to 249.

- microbots are 250 to 749.

- minibots are 750 to 1499.

- megabots are 1500+.

MN (talk)18:11, 23 June 2013

Yes.

Skilgannon (talk)18:20, 23 June 2013
 

Technically speaking, the roborumble weight classes have no minimum thresholds, only maximum thresholds. Thus, each rumble contains bots not only under its own weight limit, but also bots under the weight limits of other rumbles with a smaller maximum threshold. For example, just because a bot with a codesize of 249 bytes is a nanobot, it is no less a microbot than a bot with a codesize of 749 bytes. This is how the weight classes are structured: nano < 250 < micro < 750 < mini < 1500 < mega < positive infinity. Note that we use < and not <=, which is why we don't allow bots with a codesize of 250 bytes into the nanorumble.

Sheldor (talk)21:34, 23 June 2013
 

I know nanobots can also participate in bigger codesize classes. Only the < instead of <= was tricky.

MN (talk)22:54, 23 June 2013