Thread history

From User talk:Tmservo
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
00:42, 18 March 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
17:02, 17 March 2014 Cb (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
17:54, 16 March 2014 MN (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
11:47, 16 March 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
11:43, 16 March 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
20:17, 15 March 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
16:06, 15 March 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
01:39, 14 March 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
19:17, 13 March 2014 Cb (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
14:03, 13 March 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
09:21, 13 March 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
03:32, 13 March 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
01:44, 13 March 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
01:44, 13 March 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
01:43, 13 March 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
05:51, 12 March 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
14:26, 11 March 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
14:25, 11 March 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to literumble needs update)
12:11, 11 March 2014 Tmservo (talk | contribs) New thread created  

literumble needs update

Tmservo (talk)12:11, 11 March 2014

Tmservo,

literumble needs your CPU cycles and not update. There is only one person who is currently donating CPU cycles to battle runs, no wonder there are almost no updates. [1]

P.S. Tmservo, it is hard to read a mind of a person. Please, add description/words to your posts, not just links or pictures.

Beaming (talk)14:25, 11 March 2014

i meant update via RoboRumble client and i need A Robocode 1.8.2.0 because i Updated to 1.8.3.0 a long time ago P.S what version do you use beaming

Tmservo (talk)05:51, 12 March 2014

I use 1.8.2.0 since it the latest from which rumble accept stats.

I would prefer 1.7.3.0 since it seems to have a faster graphics in comparison to newer versions and I like to use for my internal program/debug/observe cycle.

Beaming (talk)03:32, 13 March 2014

what versions are compatible with roborumble

Tmservo (talk)09:21, 13 March 2014

If you go to the rumble statistic page you will see: Allowed Robocode versions: ['1.8.1.0', '1.8.2.0']

Beaming (talk)14:03, 13 March 2014
 

The reason only 1.8.1.0 and 1.8.2.0 are allowed is because they both have a bug which affects the scores, giving top bots a slightly lower score. If we want to switch to new versions we will have to delete all data and start fresh, because new versions fix the bug.

Skilgannon (talk)16:06, 15 March 2014

I think it is better to allow newer version to participate and to regenerate stats. It might boost number of contributors.

Robocode is hard enough to start. Not everyone will have enough patience to see that it requires older version for rumble. Besides it is better to debug/prototype a bot with the same version of robocode and rumble.

Beaming (talk)20:17, 15 March 2014
 

Suggestion about switching to newer versions.

If literumble kept separate average scores for each version on each pairing, it could support multiple versions at the same time.

And, maybe, using the version of the last upload on each pairing as the main version. Contributors could gradually upgrade their clients without need to reset the whole database.

Unused old version stats could be deleted after some time to free space.

MN (talk)17:54, 16 March 2014