Thread history
Viewing a history listing
Time | User | Activity | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
18:01, 8 April 2013 | Voidious (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Why not roborumble?) |
16:49, 8 April 2013 | Voidious (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Why not roborumble?) |
16:39, 8 April 2013 | Voidious (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Why not roborumble?) |
16:28, 8 April 2013 | Skilgannon (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Why not roborumble?) |
16:25, 8 April 2013 | Voidious (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Why not roborumble?) |
16:23, 8 April 2013 | Skilgannon (talk | contribs) | New thread created |
It isn't generating archived rankings for roborumble, any idea why? All bots have 988 pairings.
I noticed some bots had 989 pairings again yesterday. I went to check again a few minutes ago and let you know about it, since that would hold up the archive, but I see that they're at 988 now. Maybe that just fixed itself today? It checks every hour so I'll kick it when I get home if it hasn't run by then.
The rumble's been stable for a few hours now (I actually fixed that bug with the extra bots this time... I hope) and I saw a server log 15 mins ago of it requesting, so it is definitely running.
That was probably the Twitter one, which runs every 15 mins. The rumble archiver should be at the top of the hour. It's possible I turned off the "roborumble" last week when I ran it manually or something... I'll check it when I get home.
Ok, summary:
- The archiver saw pairings incomplete for a few hours, then hit a parsing error - I don't know exactly what happened. I ran it manually and it worked.
- The tweeter was set to 2800 battles for 1v1, so it has a couple bots that it's watching. Brought that back down to 2000 for now until we get the min roborumble battles back to like 3k.
- Starting up my clients again.