Robocode Guide vie explanation of a top robot

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revision as of 5 March 2013 at 16:05.
The highlighted comment was created in this revision.

Robocode Guide vie explanation of a top robot

I have been thinking about writing a guide for robocode for a while and was wondering what you guys thought. My initial plan was to go through Gilgalad and explain how everything works. I've been cleaning up Gilgalad's code so it could be used as a frame work and the new users could just mess about with different classifiers, but now I'm wondering if there Diamond on Xandercat would be better. Obviously, I have a better understanding of Gilgalad than I have of these bots, but on the other hand, reading through their code would help me get the perspective of someone who didn't write the robot.

Any thought?

    AW15:23, 5 March 2013

    Seems like a great idea. We may be in one of those phases where top bots are way ahead of any formal documentation of what they're doing, like Wave Surfing in early 2006.

    I do think Diamond is a very clean and presentable code base that would serve this purpose well. But more than that, I think the main barrier to this is just someone having the time / understanding / motivation to do it. So if you're most comfortable with Gilgalad, that would definitely get my vote. And maybe your write-up would inspire some other folks to do the same with their bots. (I'd love to do it for Diamond, it's just a matter of time / priorities.)

      Voidious16:04, 5 March 2013
       

      Sounds good to me.

      If you would like, I could check it for grammar and spelling mistakes.

        Sheldor17:05, 5 March 2013