Why not roborumble?

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revision as of 8 April 2013 at 15:49.
The highlighted comment was created in this revision.

Why not roborumble?

It isn't generating archived rankings for roborumble, any idea why? All bots have 988 pairings.

    Skilgannon16:23, 8 April 2013

    I noticed some bots had 989 pairings again yesterday. I went to check again a few minutes ago and let you know about it, since that would hold up the archive, but I see that they're at 988 now. Maybe that just fixed itself today? It checks every hour so I'll kick it when I get home if it hasn't run by then.

      Voidious16:25, 8 April 2013
       

      The rumble's been stable for a few hours now (I actually fixed that bug with the extra bots this time... I hope) and I saw a server log 15 mins ago of it requesting, so it is definitely running.

        Skilgannon16:28, 8 April 2013
         

        That was probably the Twitter one, which runs every 15 mins. The rumble archiver should be at the top of the hour. It's possible I turned off the "roborumble" last week when I ran it manually or something... I'll check it when I get home.

          Voidious16:39, 8 April 2013

          On that note, I wonder what's up with the Twitter one... Either it shouldn't be checking the rumble server because of no new participants, or if it has participants that it's watching, it should have seen the rumble was stable and tweeted them.

            Voidious16:49, 8 April 2013