Wacky Scores

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revision as of 11 September 2011 at 05:08.
The highlighted comment was created in this revision.

Wacky Scores

With my latest versions of XanderCat 9.0 and 9.0.1, they seem to perform just fine with 1.7.3.0, but I am now getting really wacky scores in RoboResearch. There are no exceptions happening, but the scores are coming up a good 20% to 30% lower than the scores with 1.7.3.0 (e.g. score against Rapture.Rapture is coming up at about 65% in RoboResearch, but a consistent 90% in 1.7.3.0 test runs and in the RoboRumble). I checked to ensure my robot is not throwing any exceptions. Any thoughts on what might be causing this? It is preventing me from using RoboResearch for testing.

    Skotty00:17, 11 September 2011

    It might be due to me setting it to debug mode (it keeps robots from skipping turns, so if enemies were skipping, they are not in RR).

      Chase-san00:19, 11 September 2011
       

      I don't think so. I might have to spend some time digging into the code more. A lot of the docs and pages discussing RoboResearch seem to be outdated. For example, I keep seeing references to having a copy of Robocode installed in the robocode_install directory, but from what I can see, there doesn't seem to be any robocode_install directory. I assumed it just used robocode.jar from the lib directory. Quite confusing. So I don't even know what version of Robocode RoboResearch is using.

        Skotty00:32, 11 September 2011
         

        AFAIK you're supposed to install a copy of Robocode into robocode_install. But the original RoboResearch also came with a lib/robocode.jar that it used, which I only just recently realized it uses instead of the one in robocode_install/libs. I'm not sure what the problem is, but I'd install Robocode 1.7.3.x to robocode_install, start it up and recalculate the CPU constant, and copy that robocode.jar into roboresearch/lib. See if you still see a score discrepancy.

        RoboResearch docs could definitely use a lot of work, but hopefully with Chase taking charge to start updating it again recently, we'll resolve some of the usability issues and keep it better maintained.

          Voidious06:08, 11 September 2011