Challenge 2K9/Pre Chat

Hi, I'm going to begin this challenge. Do anyone deny?

I'll have 6 sub-classes for this challenge:

• NanoBot Movement Challenge Y2K9: Test your nanobot movement against good nanobot gun!
  • Now I'm thinking of following gun:
    • Pattern Matching: WeekendObsession, FunkyChicken
    • GF: the only one I've seen, GFNano
    • Linear: Splinter, PRAL and SRAL
    • Other: Infinity Gun and RaikoNano gun
  • Eight gun should be enough to rate nanobot movement!
• MicroBot Movement Challenge Y2K09: Test your microbot movement against good microbot gun!
  • Don't think is this needed? Is microbot strong enough to challenge with general challenger?
  • Now I'm thinking of following gun:
    • Pattern Matching: WeeklongObsession, Waylander and Toorklid
    • GF: HedgehogGF, RaikoMicro
    • (not have anymore ideas, please add a comment and I'll open a vote!)
• WaveSurfing Challenge Y2K9: test your bot against simple targeting.
  • By having three old bots, WSCBotA, WSCBotB and WSCBotC still act like it was in WSMCY2K6. Now, I'll add Mean Targeting to it! (By my test in BlackHole, most wavesurfer show its weakness with Mean Circular Gun.)
    • WSCBotD fire Mean Linear gun averaged on velocity at history depth of 10.
    • WSCBotE fire Mean Linear gun averaged on both velocity and heading at history depth of 10.
    • WSCBotF fire Mean Circular gun averaged on velocity at history depth of 10.
    • WSCBotG fire Mean Circular gun averaged on both velocity and heading change at history depth of 10.
• Movement Adaption Challenge Y2K9: test your bot with better learning gun
• Curve Flattening Challenge Y2K9: how much can you flat the movement curve?
  • I'm thinking of Kawagi's entropy should use to rate each robot here.
• AntiPatternMatcherChallenge Y2K9: how much can you random?
  • Old, simple pattern matcher aren't interesting enough. How about Statistical Pattern Matcher?

Main challenge

Like MCY2K7, let's vote for reference bot!

The 'default' gun shall be voted, too, but later :)

• old RaikoGun - Pretty Well
• DookiLighting with AS gun off - interesting
• DrussGunDC - should work too good.
• Bee - too good, too.
• Horizon DC Gun - ???

One more, Do you want the DC challenge? Currently 7 challenges should take a lot of time to work for me now...

If no one deny within a week, I'm going to rule this challenge. » Nat | Talk » 19:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

---

Comments

I have a few comments:

• Yes, NanoBot is good! I was just thinking we need this the other day.
• WaveSurfing is not about dodging GF and AntiSurfer much. The biggest point of wavesurfing is being able to adaptively dodge ALL kinds of guns. Including head-on, linear, circular, pattern matchers, are also all very important in REALLY gauging how well a wavesurfer performs. In fact, in some ways with wavesurfing the following is a very good rule: Unless you can get 98%+ against head-on targeting WITHOUT firing, then you have some significant bugs/flaws that you could put all focus into fixing. Similarly, simple targeting is also very important to gauge. Only after you've perfected against the simple targeting, should you try to improve it against the fancier things.
• You seem to indicate a small number of bots with how you say "best pair of" and such. Really, it's not a fair test unless you have far more challenge bots than that.
• The main challenge could maybe with some additions/removals/updates probably as well
• Actually, instead of "WaveSurfing Challange" I'd suggest a "Avoid the Simple Targeting" challenge, and a seperate "Avoid the Adaptive Guns" challenge. In fact, this could absorb the "main" one as well maybe. Just have one with everything from head-on to nano pattern matchers, and one with everything like high-end pattern matchers up to strong GF guns and AntiSurfer guns.

Other than that, cheers! --Rednaxela 19:45, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I've change the class above, do you have any more comment on that, Rednaxela?

Also other robocoder (look for Skilgannon and Voidious), refused? If not the rules will going on within a week I promise. » Nat | Talk » 14:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)