Talk:TybaltMelee

Now you've gone and done it. Whne this bot gets competative, I'll have to go revisit DustBunny again :) --Miked0801 05:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! This is my first top ten bot, and I think I still have some upgrades for it. Just looking at the scores, I've been wondering how they're calculated. Do you get a score just whenever two nano bots are in a match together, or does it have to be a match of only nano's? Because if Tybalt will be fighting all the melee bots, I'll need to update my testbed.....--CrazyBassoonist 12:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

In melee, you get a score whenever there are two nanos in the same match. A full nano battle is likely a very rare occurrence. --Darkcanuck 13:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Hmm.... I've only tested against other nano's so far, maybe this will help me improve it.... Thanks--CrazyBassoonist 13:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Also, I would like to tell you that your robot Infinity has the most annoying movement ever created. I can't count the times while testing that I saw Tybalt with 60-70 energy beaten by Infinity with 10-20 energy just because he couldn't hit the thing--CrazyBassoonist 12:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Great bot, well done! I'm absolutely noob at melee, but I plan to make a 1v1/melee nano, but the best would be a 1v1/melee/team version. ;) --HUNRobar 14:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Ouch.... Right now Tybalt is about 0.01 points away from a higher spot, and the next highest robot is just 0.05 points from that. I guess a few points can go a long way here--CrazyBassoonist 19:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Keep in mind that the scores are not all that stable in melee land. Because you are being paired with random Megabots, you will rarely take first place, even with a good bot. Often, it comes down to who can run away from the big, mean robots the best. That's why antigrav works as well as it does at this level. Your ranking will fluctuate 10-20 points over time in either direction. --Miked0801 20:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

He, what's this? Trying to push me out of the top-10 eeh? But it's true, I have had all places between 6 and 10 and back without any change in nanomelee-participants. Nice entry, things are shaking quite heavily in melee-land the last few weeks. --GrubbmGait 23:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Push you out of the top ten? If you look closely, grofvuil is one place ahead of my bot in every place but nano!--CrazyBassoonist 00:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Why remove?

"Removed TybaltMelee; Couldn't handle the awful scores" -- CrazyBassonist from an edit summary.

What's is your awful score? I can't call 6th place awful... And if you are wondering about mega melee robot (abc.*, rz.*, justin.*, kc.* and voidious.*) Note that other nanobots are battle them too. » Nat | Talk » 13:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

No, I am quite pleased with 6th place=). I removed it from the one-on-one rumble as it was somewhere down in the 500's or 600's--CrazyBassoonist 13:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Oops. Sorry for misunderstanding. Actually that isn't call awful by my standard. I recently working on some new nanobot movement and I expected to be around middle of the NanoBot chart. Well, it is at the #2 place, only from the last =) » Nat | Talk » 13:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

6th so far with a few mro bots to go against. Nice. I've switched my local computer over to melee battles for a bit to help average out your stats. --Miked0801 14:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)