Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Archived Talk"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Pondering)
(result from doing just talk namespace)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
I kind of wonder what would hapepen if you omit the NS_ARCHIVE lines and leave the NS_ARCHIVED_TALK lines. Being an odd ID should still signify to it that it's a 'discussion' namespace, but not having NS_ARCHIVED might usefully do something? Or maybe that would just break it. I don't know. Just pondering --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 17:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 
I kind of wonder what would hapepen if you omit the NS_ARCHIVE lines and leave the NS_ARCHIVED_TALK lines. Being an odd ID should still signify to it that it's a 'discussion' namespace, but not having NS_ARCHIVED might usefully do something? Or maybe that would just break it. I don't know. Just pondering --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 17:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
:That will result like this:
 +
:[[Image:Mw-onlydiscussion.jpg]]
 +
:(Sorry for censors, but I use Firefox Thai and reading Harry Potter Fanfiction right now and I don't want you all to know what exactly story I'm reading) This is a new installation with MediaWiki/1.14.0 with following line in LocalSettings.php
 +
<pre>
 +
// Custom namespace
 +
define ("NS_ARCHIVED", 100);
 +
define ("NS_ARCHIVED_TALK", 101);
 +
//$wgExtraNamespaces[NS_ARCHIVED]    = "Archived";
 +
$wgExtraNamespaces[NS_ARCHIVED_TALK] = "Archived_talk";
 +
</pre>
 +
: but I'm agree that the Archived is useful for one other thing, to archived a full collection unmodified (except the table) articles from the old wiki.
 +
:&raquo; <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> &raquo; 17:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:31, 29 April 2009

I don't know if anybody else is paying attention, but Rednaxela brought up the idea of using a separate namespace for Archived Talk (on Talk:Migration), and I think it's a really good idea. I want to read up on Mediawiki namespaces a bit more before digging in and doing it, but I just wanted to note here that this is in the plans... --Voidious 15:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm paying. I want it. This little piece of code put in LocalSettings.php will do:

// Custom namespace
define ("NS_ARCHIVED", 100);
define ("NS_ARCHIVED_TALK", 101);
$wgExtraNamespaces[NS_ARCHIVED]      = "Archived";
$wgExtraNamespaces[NS_ARCHIVED_TALK] = "Archived_talk";

At least it do on my MediaWiki/1.14 installation at Thai RoboWiki. This will create the Archived and Archived_talk: namespaces. » Nat | Talk » 16:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I kind of wonder what would hapepen if you omit the NS_ARCHIVE lines and leave the NS_ARCHIVED_TALK lines. Being an odd ID should still signify to it that it's a 'discussion' namespace, but not having NS_ARCHIVED might usefully do something? Or maybe that would just break it. I don't know. Just pondering --Rednaxela 17:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

That will result like this:
Mw-onlydiscussion.jpg
(Sorry for censors, but I use Firefox Thai and reading Harry Potter Fanfiction right now and I don't want you all to know what exactly story I'm reading) This is a new installation with MediaWiki/1.14.0 with following line in LocalSettings.php
// Custom namespace
define ("NS_ARCHIVED", 100);
define ("NS_ARCHIVED_TALK", 101);
//$wgExtraNamespaces[NS_ARCHIVED]    = "Archived";
$wgExtraNamespaces[NS_ARCHIVED_TALK] = "Archived_talk";
but I'm agree that the Archived is useful for one other thing, to archived a full collection unmodified (except the table) articles from the old wiki.
» Nat | Talk » 17:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)