Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Articles Requiring Revision"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Response to Voidious)
(response to AaronR)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I think this shouldn't be a category of article, but rather we should use the MediaWiki functions like stubs and cleanup notices. If we want a separate list, I think it should be a subpage of [[Migration]]. Thoughts? --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 18:15, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 
I think this shouldn't be a category of article, but rather we should use the MediaWiki functions like stubs and cleanup notices. If we want a separate list, I think it should be a subpage of [[Migration]]. Thoughts? --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 18:15, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 
* When articles are marked with [[Template:Cleanup]], they are put into this category automatically. The same thing happens with [[Template:Stub]] and [[:Category:Stubs]]; this allows one to see at a glance what articles have been marked with each template. They also do this at Wikipedia. --[[User:AaronR|AaronR]] 18:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 
* When articles are marked with [[Template:Cleanup]], they are put into this category automatically. The same thing happens with [[Template:Stub]] and [[:Category:Stubs]]; this allows one to see at a glance what articles have been marked with each template. They also do this at Wikipedia. --[[User:AaronR|AaronR]] 18:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
* Oh, nice! Nevermind then. =) --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 18:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:37, 13 November 2007

I think this shouldn't be a category of article, but rather we should use the MediaWiki functions like stubs and cleanup notices. If we want a separate list, I think it should be a subpage of Migration. Thoughts? --Voidious 18:15, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

  • When articles are marked with Template:Cleanup, they are put into this category automatically. The same thing happens with Template:Stub and Category:Stubs; this allows one to see at a glance what articles have been marked with each template. They also do this at Wikipedia. --AaronR 18:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Oh, nice! Nevermind then. =) --Voidious 18:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)