View source for Category talk:Super Sample Bots

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Super Sample Bots are awesome. I've thought for a loooong time that there needs to be a set of robots somewhere between the original sample bots (roger roger) and the Jedi masters in the Roborumble. Skotty 00:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
ReWrite107:00, 4 September 2011

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

 

Return to Thread:Category talk:Super Sample Bots/ReWrite.

On that topic. Also need to break out of our need to write 'strong' robots, and instead focus on writing decent robots that are well explained and easy to understand. Easy to understand does not mean using only elementary programming (if, for, else) but rather structuring the tried and true algorithms into their simpler forms, even if this reduces their overall performance or effectiveness. Such as VCS vs GF List. Symbolic PM vs Bruteforce PM. Surfing vs Gun Heat based Head-on dodging. Etc.

They are suppose to be a decent step up from samples, they shouldn't force them entirely from their comfort zone into one made of razor blades.

Chase-san07:00, 4 September 2011