Difference between revisions of "RumbleArchives talk:Page format"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(feedback) |
Darkcanuck (talk | contribs) (→Feedback: looks great) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Feedback == | == Feedback == | ||
| − | I've got the script pretty much done, besides actually logging into the wiki and creating the pages after it makes them (which is easy). Can you guys look this over and tell me anything you think should be changed about the format? I have one | + | I've got the script pretty much done, besides actually logging into the wiki and creating the pages after it makes them (which is easy). Can you guys look this over and tell me anything you think should be changed about the format? I have <strike>one</strike> two things for now: |
* Rounded numbers should all be the same length, e.g., 50.10009 should not end up as "50.1". | * Rounded numbers should all be the same length, e.g., 50.10009 should not end up as "50.1". | ||
| + | * Add category, one per rumble. (e.g., "Archived MiniMeleeRumble Rankings") | ||
Thanks. =) --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 02:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | Thanks. =) --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 02:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
I'd like it to separate name and flag like the old wiki. But current is fine. --[[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 02:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | I'd like it to separate name and flag like the old wiki. But current is fine. --[[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 02:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I kind of like it how it is, but whatever you guys want is cool with me. I just copied the rumble server format. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 03:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : It's ok, all needed info is in there. --[[User:GrubbmGait|GrubbmGait]] 16:36, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fixed the above issues, also made ELO/Glicko-2 round to 1 digit instead of 2, and added the RD/volatility for Glicko-2. Any good reasons to remove/keep ELO? --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 21:49, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Looks great! I'd prefer to see "Survival" rather than "Surv" but I understand it affects the column width. The bot links are a nice touch. Regarding ELO, I really wish I knew why it's deflated so much over the past year. It was fine for the first few months but now... --[[User:Darkcanuck|Darkcanuck]] 05:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:51, 9 October 2009
Feedback
I've got the script pretty much done, besides actually logging into the wiki and creating the pages after it makes them (which is easy). Can you guys look this over and tell me anything you think should be changed about the format? I have one two things for now:
- Rounded numbers should all be the same length, e.g., 50.10009 should not end up as "50.1".
- Add category, one per rumble. (e.g., "Archived MiniMeleeRumble Rankings")
Thanks. =) --Voidious 02:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
I'd like it to separate name and flag like the old wiki. But current is fine. --Nat Pavasant 02:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- I kind of like it how it is, but whatever you guys want is cool with me. I just copied the rumble server format. --Voidious 03:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- It's ok, all needed info is in there. --GrubbmGait 16:36, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Fixed the above issues, also made ELO/Glicko-2 round to 1 digit instead of 2, and added the RD/volatility for Glicko-2. Any good reasons to remove/keep ELO? --Voidious 21:49, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Looks great! I'd prefer to see "Survival" rather than "Surv" but I understand it affects the column width. The bot links are a nice touch. Regarding ELO, I really wish I knew why it's deflated so much over the past year. It was fine for the first few months but now... --Darkcanuck 05:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
