Difference between revisions of "Talk:Anti-Gravity Tutorial"
(A quick note) |
(Tutorial should involve create a robot) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
One quick note, is I'm pretty sure the "check various angles" approach is very much not the traditional anti-grav approach, and is closer to min-risk movements actually. The 'traditional' anti-grav approach is simply summing up a 2d total force vector rather than checking angles. --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 02:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | One quick note, is I'm pretty sure the "check various angles" approach is very much not the traditional anti-grav approach, and is closer to min-risk movements actually. The 'traditional' anti-grav approach is simply summing up a 2d total force vector rather than checking angles. --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 02:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | In my thought a 'Tutorial' should involve creating a robot. I'll change it later when I have more time. --[[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 14:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:14, 21 January 2010
I'm posting this in it's current form because it took me a lot longer to write than I thought it would, and I don't want to lose all of my work. I would appreciate any ways people could improve it; please go ahead and change anything you can! I'm not exactly a Robocode guru, and there's still stuff that needs to be added to this--CrazyBassoonist 02:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
One quick note, is I'm pretty sure the "check various angles" approach is very much not the traditional anti-grav approach, and is closer to min-risk movements actually. The 'traditional' anti-grav approach is simply summing up a 2d total force vector rather than checking angles. --Rednaxela 02:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
In my thought a 'Tutorial' should involve creating a robot. I'll change it later when I have more time. --Nat Pavasant 14:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
