Difference between revisions of "Talk:Caligula"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Thanks)
(Congrats!)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Thanks! As you examine more nanos and micros, you'll find that many of them start by using [[Stop And Go]] movement to defeat robots using [[Head-On Targeting]] and [[Linear Targeting]], and then switch to their main movement strategy to deal with everything else. Mine is the only one with ramming as its back-up strategy, though:-)--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 19:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 
Thanks! As you examine more nanos and micros, you'll find that many of them start by using [[Stop And Go]] movement to defeat robots using [[Head-On Targeting]] and [[Linear Targeting]], and then switch to their main movement strategy to deal with everything else. Mine is the only one with ramming as its back-up strategy, though:-)--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 19:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
Wow!  You beat Moebius!  I am completely impressed and will have to go check it out to see how you did it.  LBB is kinda a cheap so I consider this a very, very good entry!  We might have a game again.  --[[User:Miked0801|Miked0801]] 23:31, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:31, 8 May 2011

I really did not understood how I could have control in the first 10 rounds, but then if I calculated 100 rounds we ended equal!

Until I read this page, and figured the things that happened on my screen were not a strange RC bug.

I think this ramming tactic is brilliant! --Hapiel 19:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! As you examine more nanos and micros, you'll find that many of them start by using Stop And Go movement to defeat robots using Head-On Targeting and Linear Targeting, and then switch to their main movement strategy to deal with everything else. Mine is the only one with ramming as its back-up strategy, though:-)--CrazyBassoonist 19:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Wow! You beat Moebius! I am completely impressed and will have to go check it out to see how you did it. LBB is kinda a cheap so I consider this a very, very good entry! We might have a game again. --Miked0801 23:31, 7 May 2011 (UTC)