Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chalk"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Good to be back) |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: No, Corbos returns with a massive RoboRumble uploads =) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 10:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC) | : No, Corbos returns with a massive RoboRumble uploads =) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 10:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | Good to be back. We'll see if anything productive comes of it - Chalk's been stuck for a while. I've got a few ideas but they may simply ruin my [[performance enchancing | + | Good to be back. We'll see if anything productive comes of it - Chalk's been stuck for a while. I've got a few ideas but they may simply ruin my [[Performance Enhancing Bug | performance enchancing bugs]] versus make Chalk more competitive. See you in the Rumble! [[User:Corbos|Corbos]] 14:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC) |
== License == | == License == | ||
Revision as of 16:02, 26 May 2009
The return of Corbos!
Oh my! Corbos returns with an update to Chalk! Salutations to you Corbos! Chalk has been a good testbed bot for me and will be interested to see it evolve more :) --Rednaxela 05:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Good to be back. We'll see if anything productive comes of it - Chalk's been stuck for a while. I've got a few ideas but they may simply ruin my performance enchancing bugs versus make Chalk more competitive. See you in the Rumble! Corbos 14:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
License
Hey, which license do you use? "Open Source" is not a license. Or you publish this robot under Public Domain? » Nat | Talk » 13:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Nice catch. I changed the license to public domain. Corbos 14:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
