Talk:Coriantumr/Understanding Coriantumr

From Robowiki
< Talk:Coriantumr
Revision as of 21:04, 9 August 2017 by MultiplyByZer0 (talk | contribs) (MultiplyByZer0 moved page Talk:Melee Strategy/Understanding Coriantumr to Talk:Coriantumr/Understanding Coriantumr: Move article to subpage of the bot)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Credits - Coriantumr/Understanding Coriantumr
Old wiki page: MeleeStrategy/UnderstandingCoriantumr
Original author(s): Kawigi

Hmm... I don't see any reasons why this page and Understanding HawkOnFire need to be sub-pages of Melee Strategy. I think it should be on its own page like Understanding Coriantumr and put it in Tutorial category. Any thoughts? » Nat | Talk » 13:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

I agree that it shouldn't be a sup-page. Understanding Coriantumr seems a fine name to me, and it would still have a similarity in the article names ("Understanding <Bot>"). It should definitely be under Tutorials, but I think the Strategy category category needs some re-thinking... Right now we have Category:1-vs-1 Strategy as a subcategory and a page called Melee Strategy, which is kind of odd. Off-topic, but I think Category:Robocode Theory and Category:Terminology could use some re-thinking, too. --Voidious 18:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, that's confused. I agree with you on strategy-related category. We should have Melee Strategy category with a page Melee Strategy in that category as a top page i.e. not under any characterized sections (I don't remember how, but I've see this on Wikipedia) About other two categories you mentioned, I think we should rename Category:Robocode Theory to [[:Category:Theory], readers are supposed to know that they are Robocode's. But what is Theory and what is Terminology by the way? On the other hand, I don't think eight years is enough to have a 'theory' =) » Nat | Talk » 04:37, 29 August 2009 (UTC)