Difference between revisions of "Talk:CunobelinDC/Version History"
(Comment about CunobelinDC Anti-BulletCatcher version :)) |
Skilgannon (talk | contribs) (no, awesome bot *you've* got =)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
No you didn't! Haha! Well.. I'm flattered :D Awesome bot you got there.--[[User:Rsim|Rsim]] 20:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC) | No you didn't! Haha! Well.. I'm flattered :D Awesome bot you got there.--[[User:Rsim|Rsim]] 20:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Haha, all I did was make it so that [[CunobelingDC]] aims as if he's firing from an approximation of his next location. It would be easy enough on your part to incorporate something that detects whether a bot is firing using their current position to fire or their next position. Though this could quickly get out of hand in a cat-and-mouse kind of way =) I think one of the reasons [[BulletCatcher]] was so effective against this gun before was because it rounds any lateral velocity below 0.5 down to 0, so according to the patterns, your bot never had any lateral velocity at all. I'm very impressed with [[BulletCatcher]], great work =) --[[User:Skilgannon|Skilgannon]] 20:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:44, 16 August 2009
No you didn't! Haha! Well.. I'm flattered :D Awesome bot you got there.--Rsim 20:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Haha, all I did was make it so that CunobelingDC aims as if he's firing from an approximation of his next location. It would be easy enough on your part to incorporate something that detects whether a bot is firing using their current position to fire or their next position. Though this could quickly get out of hand in a cat-and-mouse kind of way =) I think one of the reasons BulletCatcher was so effective against this gun before was because it rounds any lateral velocity below 0.5 down to 0, so according to the patterns, your bot never had any lateral velocity at all. I'm very impressed with BulletCatcher, great work =) --Skilgannon 20:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
