Difference between revisions of "Talk:DustBunny"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(one-on-one?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If you manage to fit that Random/Linear gun into it, will you entered it to NanoRumble (not melee)? This bot may kill the DoctorBob records!! » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 14:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | If you manage to fit that Random/Linear gun into it, will you entered it to NanoRumble (not melee)? This bot may kill the DoctorBob records!! » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 14:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It fits :) - I just need to find 2 more bytes to enter it into the normal rumble due to it no longer being able to call getBattleFieldWidth() and Height(). The other problem being random/linear is poor for melee - linear reduction linear is better ([[Infinity]] style.) To make it melee proof will require another 4 bytes or so. Hmmm --[[User:Miked0801|Miked0801]] 15:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:36, 1 June 2009
If you manage to fit that Random/Linear gun into it, will you entered it to NanoRumble (not melee)? This bot may kill the DoctorBob records!! » Nat | Talk » 14:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
It fits :) - I just need to find 2 more bytes to enter it into the normal rumble due to it no longer being able to call getBattleFieldWidth() and Height(). The other problem being random/linear is poor for melee - linear reduction linear is better (Infinity style.) To make it melee proof will require another 4 bytes or so. Hmmm --Miked0801 15:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
