Difference between revisions of "Talk:GateKeeper"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(about LittleBlackBook)
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Not to upset you, but you would beat LittleBlackBook without much problem since that robot relies on its internal table to aim and move. That is, it is preloaded with tactical information on how to fight each robot. Even though it has a fallback for robot that isn't currently in its database, it is surely not strong against newer robot. Do not test against him if you want accurate result. --[[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 08:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 
Not to upset you, but you would beat LittleBlackBook without much problem since that robot relies on its internal table to aim and move. That is, it is preloaded with tactical information on how to fight each robot. Even though it has a fallback for robot that isn't currently in its database, it is surely not strong against newer robot. Do not test against him if you want accurate result. --[[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 08:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
Sorry - I just started making robocode bots not too long ago and I was pretty excited when I saw how well my bots performed against the #1 nano. Anyways I removed that line from the description. Thanks for informing me of that :) --[[User:Exauge|Exauge]] 22:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:06, 7 May 2010

Not to upset you, but you would beat LittleBlackBook without much problem since that robot relies on its internal table to aim and move. That is, it is preloaded with tactical information on how to fight each robot. Even though it has a fallback for robot that isn't currently in its database, it is surely not strong against newer robot. Do not test against him if you want accurate result. --Nat Pavasant 08:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry - I just started making robocode bots not too long ago and I was pretty excited when I saw how well my bots performed against the #1 nano. Anyways I removed that line from the description. Thanks for informing me of that :) --Exauge 22:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)