Difference between revisions of "Talk:Leveraging Algorithm"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(oh, but your summary is a lot funnier...) |
Darkcanuck (talk | contribs) (real, but still amusing) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: Yeah, it sound amusing. But it is a ''real'' algorithm, isn't it? (EDIT: But your edit summary is a lot more amusing that that =)) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 15:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | : Yeah, it sound amusing. But it is a ''real'' algorithm, isn't it? (EDIT: But your edit summary is a lot more amusing that that =)) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 15:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Oh, I'm not making fun of the algorithm (in fact I understand why it was named that way) but I bet some mathematician got a kick out of naming it. =) --[[User:Darkcanuck|Darkcanuck]] 15:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:27, 12 August 2009
Oh my... so many errors. I must have been more tired than I had thought when I made this page. --Rednaxela 14:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
"probably approximately correct" -- am I the only one who finds this amusing? --Darkcanuck 14:54, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, it sound amusing. But it is a real algorithm, isn't it? (EDIT: But your edit summary is a lot more amusing that that =)) » Nat | Talk » 15:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm not making fun of the algorithm (in fact I understand why it was named that way) but I bet some mathematician got a kick out of naming it. =) --Darkcanuck 15:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
