Precise MEA

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Gilgalad/targetingStrategy
← Thread:Talk:Gilgalad/targetingStrategy/Precise MEA/reply (2)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Imprecise MEA is not responsible for imprecise targeting. Precise MEA only cuts off angles that are not reacheable by the opponent. Simply said, precise MEA has only advantages. The benefits of imprecise targeting on the other hand, can cause quite an interesting discussion. Imprecise targeting is not perse worse than precise targeting, f.e. random targeting can be a valid strategy against (very) good bots.

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Scaling/segmenting your gun differently than your opponents dodging makes it harder to learn/dodge and can be good. As long as it doesn´t shoot walls (unreachable angles).
[[DrussGT]] keeps changing its gun weights (segmentation) in the next version every time someone knocks it off the top and seems to be working very well.

Return to Thread:Talk:Gilgalad/targetingStrategy/Precise MEA/reply (4).

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Gilgalad/targetingStrategy/Precise_MEA/reply_(2)#Precise_MEA_514"