Doing better against simple targeters

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Yes, I do that, but I eventually start getting hit and then I stop falling back to my preloaded GFs. What I wonder is how those top 2K6 bots can still learn well.

Rsalesc (talk)‎12:55, 6 October 2017

well, don’t use one hit as some threshold, rather, do that smoother

Xor (talk)‎13:11, 6 October 2017
 

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:Talk:Movement/Doing better against simple targeters/reply (9).

Maybe trying Normal Distribution would help. Sometimes I see Rechner just going between 2 possible bullet locations and get hit there.

Dsekercioglu (talk)‎15:35, 6 October 2017

I am using normal distribution in probability view. But this is not helping me against simple guns.

iirc something like 1 / (1 + abs(x)) works better.

Xor (talk)‎17:23, 6 October 2017

What is a probability view?

Dsekercioglu (talk)‎19:54, 6 October 2017

meaning traditional wave surfing buffers

as my style is more like shrapnel surfing, which is called peak views.

Xor (talk)‎21:23, 6 October 2017
 
 
 
 

I know bots starts using new predictors when enemy hit rate increases. It is just like a flattener but still does hit learning. Also I am amazed by Dookious and DrussGT dodging every type of targeting near perfect.

Dsekercioglu (talk)‎15:38, 6 October 2017
 
Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Movement/Doing_better_against_simple_targeters/reply_(6)#Doing_better_against_simple_targeters_5885"