Thread history
Viewing a history listing
| Time | User | Activity | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21:42, 14 May 2012 | Rednaxela (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to 0.6 update) |
| 21:02, 14 May 2012 | Skilgannon (talk | contribs) | Comment text edited | (clarify) |
| 20:57, 14 May 2012 | Skilgannon (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to 0.6 update) |
| 18:31, 14 May 2012 | Rednaxela (talk | contribs) | New thread created |
Nice update with version 0.6 there! I'm curious, how much local testing have you been doing with Neuromancer between versions?
By the way, it looks to me like it's still slightly behind Shadow contrary to the description thing.
Yeah, between 3000 and 4000 battles it dipped from just above Shadow to a little ways below. I'll wait for this version to stabilise and then see if I need to change that =) My testing is fairly minimal. I do a few battles with some HOF, some Shiz, some DoctorBob, a sample bot and a top bot, just to check I haven't broken anything major and that the changes made some sort of difference, but I haven't had time to do any proper testing. I'm still at a stage of adding major features, once I get on to tweaking the testing will be more important I think.
In future I'll wait for 4000 battles before making any conclusions... sigh.
Ahh, interesting.
Hmm... that number of battles issues makes me wonder if I should experiment with making the rumble server show statistical significance information when comparing versions.
