Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:Random Targeting/The advantage/reply (6)"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
But wouldn't your chance of hitting increase if you only targeted the gfs that an enemy robot actually went?
 
But wouldn't your chance of hitting increase if you only targeted the gfs that an enemy robot actually went?
  
But that would be more of a fuzzy logic gun then a random gun. It enters into the realm of a real gf gun if you fire at gfs locations where the enemy is more often.
+
But that would be more of a fuzzy logic gun (it is usually somewhere in here) then a random gun. It enters into the realm of a real gf gun if you fire at gfs locations where the enemy is more often.

Latest revision as of 06:24, 7 February 2013

I think I might see your point.

While you are more likely to hit a robot at 0 if you only aim at 0. Also if you aim at -0.5 to 0.5 you are more likely to hit 0 then if you aimed at -1 to 1.

The reverse is not true. If you aim -1 to 1, you will be just as likely to hit that robot as a robot that moved -1 to 1. This is a bit counter-intuitive (to me). But I never actually studied probability. But it does make sense in a way.

But wouldn't your chance of hitting increase if you only targeted the gfs that an enemy robot actually went?

But that would be more of a fuzzy logic gun (it is usually somewhere in here) then a random gun. It enters into the realm of a real gf gun if you fire at gfs locations where the enemy is more often.