Client java version

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revision as of 4 September 2017 at 08:14.
The highlighted comment was created in this revision.

Client java version

Can we have a quick survey about java version with which you run your litumble clients?

I see that performance of my bots dropped since I switched to java-8-openjdk for bot compilations. Plus I see ridiculosly low scores for my bot against some very simple bots at the literumble. On my machine I beat them with much bigger margin. So I suspect that there is something strange with one of the clients.

For the record, I compile everything with java-8-openjdk and run my literumble clients with java provided within this jdk.

    Beaming (talk)04:03, 4 September 2017

    I'm using Java 8 for my rumbles. However, it seems that some bot stopped working on Java 8? etc. MoxieBot.

    I'm also using Java 8 and its features for bot development. However, I compile my bot with Java 8, then transpile the bytecode to Java 6 compatible using retrolambda, as Java 8 compiled code will generally refuse to run on lower platform.

      Xor (talk)05:45, 4 September 2017

      Cross porting from Java 8 seems to be excessive, if the rest of us are running Java 8. But let's see what others are running.

        Beaming (talk)06:20, 4 September 2017
         

        By the way, ncj.MoxieBot 1.0 is running OK on my machine. It sometimes freezes but it seems to be the fault of the internal logic.

          Beaming (talk)06:24, 4 September 2017

          But all my bots are getting 100% against MoxieBot on my computer, whereas there seems to be some 50% on the rumble, which makes me think that it doesn't work as expected on Java 8.

            Xor (talk)06:57, 4 September 2017
             
             

            openjdk8 here, on Linux.

              Skilgannon (talk)08:26, 4 September 2017
               

              java version "1.8.0_102" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_102-b14) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.102-b14, mixed mode)

                Cb (talk)10:14, 4 September 2017