Nominations 2017-09

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble
← Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations 2017-09/reply (16)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

To MultiplyByZer0: seems that Chalk is getting zero scores in your setup. Could you verify that? You can ignore that bot by setting 'EXCLUDE=cjm.* in your gigarumble.txt

GrubbmGait (talk)‎

DrussGT, XanderCat, and Roborio bullet-shield Chalk to death, explaining the low APS and Survival. I don't see zero scores anywhere else in the ranking table, and its rank in GigaRumble (#26) is actually above its rank in RoboRumble (#34).

MultiplyByZer0 (talk)‎

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Lol, hadn't thought of that. I had not expected though that someone that vulnerable to bullet-shielding would get that high in the PL.

Return to Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations 2017-09/reply (18).

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations_2017-09/reply_(16)#Nominations_2017-09_5740"