http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations_2017-11-25/reply_(12)&feed=atom&action=historyThread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations 2017-11-25/reply (12) - Revision history2024-03-29T14:25:49ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations_2017-11-25/reply_(12)&diff=53951&oldid=prevXor: Reply to Nominations 2017-11-252017-11-30T01:56:18Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations_2017-11-25/reply_(11)" title="Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations 2017-11-25/reply (11)">Nominations 2017-11-25</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Thanks for the detailed explanations! I thought the firing control part should be mostly the same among a lot of bots (e.g. via copying the sample bots or OS bots), but it seems that this is also the part a lot of people made mistakes in, and there are also so many variants. Some bot aims precisely but fires whenever gun-turn-remaining is less than bot width, some forgot to call setAdjustXXX, some aims from the next tick but uses velocity from the last tick to predict... Such mistakes are so subtle that no one notices, until they incidentally found their bots not vulnerable to BSs. I know very few bots protecting themselves from BSs deliberately, most people get protected occasionally.</div>Xor