http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations_2017-11-25/reply_(15)&feed=atom&action=historyThread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations 2017-11-25/reply (15) - Revision history2024-03-28T11:45:44ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations_2017-11-25/reply_(15)&diff=53959&oldid=prevXor: Reply to Nominations 2017-11-252017-11-30T13:27:24Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations_2017-11-25/reply_(13)" title="Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations 2017-11-25/reply (13)">Nominations 2017-11-25</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>I think with a modern Passive Bullet Shadower, you can easily implement Active Bullet Shadower by brute-forcing firing angles — and actually with some math you should be able to calculate that directly. <br />
<br />
I've been long thinking about some smooth transition between Bullet Shielder to Active Bullet Shadower and Passive Bullet Shadower. E.g., shield at first, then begin dodging. When there's a chance to shadow, do that deliberately if worth the miss.</div>Xor