Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/Is there a mistake in Rumble battle staging/reply (11)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Reply to Is there a mistake in Rumble battle staging) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | No, you can clearly see from the [https://github.com/bumfo/literumble/blob/master/HandleQueuedResults.py#L321 code] that all data is saved into bot.PairingsList, which gets overridden each time a new battle is ran. | + | No, you can clearly see from the [https://github.com/bumfo/literumble/blob/master/HandleQueuedResults.py#L321 code] that all data is saved into bot.PairingsList, which gets overridden each time a new battle is ran. So if a pairing is missing, the data may not be lost, but if a pairing shows 1 battle, then that's all LiteRumble has. |
[[User:Skilgannon|Skilgannon]] once said that he had backups. We could ask help from him and do a merge, e.g. take whatever pairing with max battle counter. | [[User:Skilgannon|Skilgannon]] once said that he had backups. We could ask help from him and do a merge, e.g. take whatever pairing with max battle counter. | ||
Latest revision as of 04:10, 23 February 2023
No, you can clearly see from the code that all data is saved into bot.PairingsList, which gets overridden each time a new battle is ran. So if a pairing is missing, the data may not be lost, but if a pairing shows 1 battle, then that's all LiteRumble has.
Skilgannon once said that he had backups. We could ask help from him and do a merge, e.g. take whatever pairing with max battle counter.
