Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/Keeping worse bots/reply (14)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reply to On removing bots worse than SittingDuck) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This only happens when no one that runs literumble has access to those bots. And the real problem is our priority battle algorithm — it takes more than 3000 battles to be guaranteed to have a full pairings, but the default battles threshold is 2000, which leaves new bots typically with missing pairings. | This only happens when no one that runs literumble has access to those bots. And the real problem is our priority battle algorithm — it takes more than 3000 battles to be guaranteed to have a full pairings, but the default battles threshold is 2000, which leaves new bots typically with missing pairings. | ||
| − | '''Unstable rankings has nothing to do with those | + | '''Unstable rankings has nothing to do with those inaccessable bots.''' |
Revision as of 01:51, 8 September 2017
This only happens when no one that runs literumble has access to those bots. And the real problem is our priority battle algorithm — it takes more than 3000 battles to be guaranteed to have a full pairings, but the default battles threshold is 2000, which leaves new bots typically with missing pairings.
Unstable rankings has nothing to do with those inaccessable bots.
