http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Rule_Suggestions/What_do_you_think_about_a_GigaMeleeRumble%3F/reply_(28)&feed=atom&action=historyThread:Talk:RoboRumble/Rule Suggestions/What do you think about a GigaMeleeRumble?/reply (28) - Revision history2024-03-28T11:15:10ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Rule_Suggestions/What_do_you_think_about_a_GigaMeleeRumble%3F/reply_(28)&diff=33401&oldid=prevMN: Reply to What do you think about a GigaMeleeRumble?2014-05-03T17:25:56Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Rule_Suggestions/What_do_you_think_about_a_GigaMeleeRumble%3F/reply_(18)" title="Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Rule Suggestions/What do you think about a GigaMeleeRumble?/reply (18)">What do you think about a GigaMeleeRumble?</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>I'll make a README sometime.<br />
<br />
You compile with Maven through the roborumbleathome-pom module. You also need Robocode components pre-installed in your local repository. They are nowhere in any internet Maven repository. This is for compiling.<br />
<br />
For running, you run a single coordinator instance, and as many worker instances as you have cores. You pass coordinator IP address through command line argument. Port is hard-coded at 1099 (RMI default). See the .bat files for an example.<br />
<br />
Both coordinator and workers use the same configuration files as the official client, although they ignore some of the parameters.<br />
<br />
It could be more configurable. But as it is, it is running fine for me so I stopped improving it for quite some time. Now that it is open source, feel free to contribute.</div>MN