Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:Wave Surfing/GoTo Surfing/Comparing GoTo Surfing and True Surfing?/reply (12)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reply to Comparing GoTo Surfing with True Surfing?) |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
But I never ever skipped a turn on my computer :( whereas I see a lot of very low score on the literumble which I can never reproduce on my computer. | But I never ever skipped a turn on my computer :( whereas I see a lot of very low score on the literumble which I can never reproduce on my computer. | ||
| − | May be I should eliminate all the object allocation in loops ;( I used to thought Java would use stack allocation for those objects after escape analysis (which is available since Java 6 update 14), but it' | + | May be I should eliminate all the object allocation in loops ;( I used to thought Java would use stack allocation for those objects after escape analysis (which is available since Java 6 update 14), but it doesn't. |
Latest revision as of 05:17, 2 September 2017
I would say it's perfectly aligned, from the debug graphics the predicted next wave path is exactly the same as when it really happens.
However, I create a billion of new objects per surf ;p for every predicted new position, every stop status, etc.
But I never ever skipped a turn on my computer :( whereas I see a lot of very low score on the literumble which I can never reproduce on my computer.
May be I should eliminate all the object allocation in loops ;( I used to thought Java would use stack allocation for those objects after escape analysis (which is available since Java 6 update 14), but it doesn't.
