Thread history

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Yatagan/Source
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
No results

I think I figured out a way to get those bytes back--at a loss of targeting accuracy. We'll see if it's worth it.

I highly doubt you'd be able to fit anti-ram in 3-4 bytes. But, it seems that almost every time I say that, you prove me wrong. :)

Sheldor22:19, 3 April 2013

Ooooh, that is ugly ugly ugly. But this is nano, the king of ugly, so it would only be fitting if the king was ugly too. I'm not sure what we'd gain from rambots would make up for this, but it's worth a try I guess.

Skilgannon10:58, 4 April 2013

I'm not really worried about rambots; Yatagan already does fine against them. Let's just enter this version as it is, and see if the performance loss is substantial.

Sheldor13:32, 4 April 2013

I'm not sure why, but it stayed at 249 bytes.

Skilgannon13:44, 4 April 2013