Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:AW/guideToRobocode/Sitll haven't decided on a robot/reply (2)"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(Major edit.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Great start, but I agree with [[Voidious]] that it might not be best to put all the rules together right at the start.
 +
 +
It would make sense to use [[DrussGT]], as it is the highest ranking 1v1 robot.  But really, the most important thing is how well you understand the code, and I suppose [[Gilgalad]] would win that.
 +
 
Perhaps, instead of jumping into a bot with thousands of lines of code, you could start with walk-throughs of a few sample bots and/or [[:Category:Super Sample Bots|Super Sample bots]], just to give the reader a basic idea of a robot's code.  And, I know you're writing this guide for experienced programmers, but you have to leave something for the noobs.  :)
 
Perhaps, instead of jumping into a bot with thousands of lines of code, you could start with walk-throughs of a few sample bots and/or [[:Category:Super Sample Bots|Super Sample bots]], just to give the reader a basic idea of a robot's code.  And, I know you're writing this guide for experienced programmers, but you have to leave something for the noobs.  :)

Revision as of 00:40, 9 March 2013

Great start, but I agree with Voidious that it might not be best to put all the rules together right at the start.

It would make sense to use DrussGT, as it is the highest ranking 1v1 robot. But really, the most important thing is how well you understand the code, and I suppose Gilgalad would win that.

Perhaps, instead of jumping into a bot with thousands of lines of code, you could start with walk-throughs of a few sample bots and/or Super Sample bots, just to give the reader a basic idea of a robot's code. And, I know you're writing this guide for experienced programmers, but you have to leave something for the noobs. :)