Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:D414/What's the highest ranking non-learning bot in the rumble?/reply (6)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | If average velocity (with window size k) is non-learning, how about play it forward using only k recent scans? Both are not changing behavior based on results, only recent scans, plus, play it forward is merely a more precise version of “averageing” | + | If average velocity (with window size k) is non-learning, how about play it forward using only k recent scans? Both are not changing behavior based on results, only recent scans, plus, play it forward is merely a more precise version of “averageing”. |
+ | |||
+ | IMO both are learning using k scans, the only difference is the latter is more precise, and using data more effectively. |
Latest revision as of 04:03, 26 January 2024
If average velocity (with window size k) is non-learning, how about play it forward using only k recent scans? Both are not changing behavior based on results, only recent scans, plus, play it forward is merely a more precise version of “averageing”.
IMO both are learning using k scans, the only difference is the latter is more precise, and using data more effectively.