Rumble Server

Jump to navigation Jump to search

LiteRumble has full pairings (and is stabilizing quicker due to my more aggressive priority battles), I've been keeping track of my progress there =)

Skilgannon17:14, 23 July 2012

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:User talk:KID/Rumble Server/reply (17).

 

I was planning to do that this week, but got distracted by somebody making very nice progress in 1v1.

Skilgannon19:40, 23 July 2012
 

Hmm, that's quite a disparity for Diamond 1.8.1 between the two servers: 89.93 @ 2300 battles vs 89.76 @ 1400 battles. Maybe after the score comparison for bots/versions, we need a comparison between servers. =)

Voidious03:11, 24 July 2012

Yeah, I was noticing that. It could be due to the 1.7.3.0 vs 1.7.4.2 clients. I could whip up something simple similar to Darkcanuck's QueryAPI, although obviously it would have a few less fields.

Skilgannon09:21, 24 July 2012
 

Haha, ok, I was mostly kidding about the cross-server comparison app. =) 0.17 isn't that far beyond what I'd consider possible margin of error, and we've already established a few bots are acting differently in 1.7.3.2+. But on that note, your full-pairing RR server running on 1.7.4.0 may prove to be a great way to figure out which bots are having issues.

Voidious15:00, 24 July 2012