CPU benchmark advice

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revision as of 9 September 2011 at 21:10.
The highlighted comment was edited in this revision. [diff]

CPU benchmark advice

Say, any of you Robocoders have a fast quad-core machine (like Core i5/i7 or comparable) and feel like advising me? I'm considering buying a Core i7 (2600k) quad-core box that would mainly (for now) be for Robocode. But I'm wondering how much of a speed increase this will offer me.

  • How long does a minimized 35-round battle of Diamond vs itself take? (Maybe run one then "Restart", if that helps JIT things up...) I'd need to know the Diamond version, Robocode version, and what CPU you've got to make full sense of that info.
  • How much of a speed hit do you take per battle when running 4-threaded RoboResearch? Ie, if a given battle takes 60 seconds when you run single threaded, does it still take 60 seconds when you run 4 Robocodes, or how much of a hit does it take?

This would be a huge, geeky indulgence, so I'd love to get some idea what I'd be getting for my money if I actually pull the trigger. =) Thanks!

    Voidious21:47, 9 September 2011

    I have a much AMD Phenom II x4 @ 3.6 ghz. My AMD is considered slower then say a higher end i7.

    You can see here for a ALU comparison. http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/desktop-cpu-charts-2010/ALU-Performance-SiSoftware-Sandra-2010-Pro-ALU,2408.html

    Mine is closest to the AMD Phenom II X4 975 Black Edition on this chart (Overclocked 965 to 3.6). Since Robocode is math heavy you can see the result each chip gets.

    For a real performance reference see the amount of rumble I can perform an a given period (4 clients).


    On this chart, the 2600K gets over twice the score of my CPU. 114.30 vs 55.0.

      Chase-san23:08, 9 September 2011