Red links

Jump to navigation Jump to search

isn't bins covered by robot already done by PreciseIntersection? I think most bots will base that on BotWidth.

Xor (talk)16:58, 9 September 2017

As I know Precise Intersection is about when the wave will it since it is intersection but I may be wrong.

Dsekercioglu (talk)17:01, 9 September 2017

PreciseIntersection is basically SuperBotWidth ;) The real bot width of hit instead of imaginary ;)

Xor (talk)17:03, 9 September 2017
 

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:User talk:Xor/Thoughts on movement/Red links/reply (7).

What an interesting observation! It looks like there are benefits when wave crossed with 0 lateral velocity, even if it reduce MEA.

My bots logic completely ignored the fact that bot might hide in its own shadow. No the question how to program it efficiently, without doing a full blown game emulator.

Beaming (talk)22:50, 9 September 2017

However, I discovered that it's not worth to stop to decrease botwidth/mea rather than try my best to maximise mea.

Maybe it's simply because our enemy is not firing randomly ;)

Xor (talk)00:26, 10 September 2017

But it would explain why Diamond tends to do small shift and not big swinging motion.

Beaming (talk)01:21, 10 September 2017

Yes, small shift does help, when dangers are everywhere ;)

Xor (talk)02:20, 10 September 2017