Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rednaxela/kD-Tree"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(what's about RWPCL and CC_BY) |
(explaination) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Yep, so long as you don't misrepresent it's origin (i.e. claim you wrote the kd-tree in use) :) --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 13:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC) | : Yep, so long as you don't misrepresent it's origin (i.e. claim you wrote the kd-tree in use) :) --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 13:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
: You used to say that it will be licensed under RWPCL and CC-BY, but I'm more happy with this though, for that I can release the code under more tricky way than usual in-jar method =) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 14:25, 25 August 2009 (UTC) | : You used to say that it will be licensed under RWPCL and CC-BY, but I'm more happy with this though, for that I can release the code under more tricky way than usual in-jar method =) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 14:25, 25 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | : I decided I wanted to avoid as much complication as possible, and I found the zlib licence. Since I don't mind how people use it so long as they don't make false claims to have written it, and it doesn't conflict with the RWPCL (i.e. can be used in RWPCL bots), it seemed like a good match. I removed one clause that I deemed unnecessary. It seems reasonable to me :) --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 14:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:46, 25 August 2009
So this mean I can use it int close-sourced robot? » Nat | Talk » 13:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, so long as you don't misrepresent it's origin (i.e. claim you wrote the kd-tree in use) :) --Rednaxela 13:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- You used to say that it will be licensed under RWPCL and CC-BY, but I'm more happy with this though, for that I can release the code under more tricky way than usual in-jar method =) » Nat | Talk » 14:25, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- I decided I wanted to avoid as much complication as possible, and I found the zlib licence. Since I don't mind how people use it so long as they don't make false claims to have written it, and it doesn't conflict with the RWPCL (i.e. can be used in RWPCL bots), it seemed like a good match. I removed one clause that I deemed unnecessary. It seems reasonable to me :) --Rednaxela 14:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
