Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:ScalarBot/Version History/how to build a good test bed?/reply (2)"
m (Reply to how to build a good test bed?) |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
However, this version breaks the previous pattern. difference in common APS is no longer an indicator, nor the full pairing APS. | However, this version breaks the previous pattern. difference in common APS is no longer an indicator, nor the full pairing APS. | ||
| − | The reason why I test agasint relatively “weak” bots is that the majority of the rumble is there. And what affects your score the most is also there. More than half of the bots in rumble is between in APS [40, 70), and there are only 160 bots above 70, and 324 bots below 40. Bots below APS 40 can be ignored IMO, as the improvement | + | The reason why I test agasint relatively “weak” bots is that the majority of the rumble is there. And what affects your score the most is also there. More than half of the bots in rumble is between in APS [40, 70), and there are only 160 bots above 70, and 324 bots below 40. Bots below APS 40 can be ignored IMO, as the improvement against them can only be marginal. |
Latest revision as of 05:36, 27 September 2017
IIRC, in the past versions, the improvement over previous version is somewhat good indicator of final result, e.g. 0.5 increase in APS of common pairings (e.g. 300 common opponents) indicates 0.5 increase in final APS.
IMO the APS until full pairing is meanless, but the difference in common APS is useful.
However, this version breaks the previous pattern. difference in common APS is no longer an indicator, nor the full pairing APS.
The reason why I test agasint relatively “weak” bots is that the majority of the rumble is there. And what affects your score the most is also there. More than half of the bots in rumble is between in APS [40, 70), and there are only 160 bots above 70, and 324 bots below 40. Bots below APS 40 can be ignored IMO, as the improvement against them can only be marginal.
