Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Awesome enty/reply (17)"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Reply to Awesome enty)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 19:38, 22 June 2021

I tried a few (pretty simple) variants:

  • Multiplying the features by a weight matrix. One nice feature of this is that a diagonal matrix recovers standard feature weighting, so this model should be strictly better than per-feature weights.
  • A one-hidden-layer feedforward network.
  • Summing up the embeddings from the above two.

I totally agree that allowing multiplicative feature interactions as you suggest should work better though!