Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rednaxela/BotBase"
(future plans) |
(DI?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "Got no status event! Dying now! :(" -- I love this quote =) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 23:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC) | + | t "Got no status event! Dying now! :(" -- I love this quote =) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 23:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC) |
Haha, yes. That bit of code was from the rumble didn't check the version, but people used versions older than the recommended one anyway. I therefore used that to ensure my bot got 0 score on those clients, and thus had the bad result rejected by the rumble server. I should probably remove that hack since the rumble server now checks versions, AND doesn't ignore 0 results. --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 00:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC) | Haha, yes. That bit of code was from the rumble didn't check the version, but people used versions older than the recommended one anyway. I therefore used that to ensure my bot got 0 score on those clients, and thus had the bad result rejected by the rumble server. I should probably remove that hack since the rumble server now checks versions, AND doesn't ignore 0 results. --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 00:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The current changes are fairly minor really. I think I'm going to re-engineer the framework a bit before I updating here actually. There are a few aspects I'm somewhat unsatisfied with. For one thing, I'm considering setting up a framework for bot components based around dependency injection (perhaps using picocontainer) --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 15:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | The current changes are fairly minor really. I think I'm going to re-engineer the framework a bit before I updating here actually. There are a few aspects I'm somewhat unsatisfied with. For one thing, I'm considering setting up a framework for bot components based around dependency injection (perhaps using picocontainer) --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 15:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Isn't Robocode blocked the use of Reflection which is the heart of PicoContainter? I'm not really sure it will work. But funny thing is that we need not to attach any dependency to a robot =) But from what I have read about DI, if one's codebase is not large and complicated, using no DI will result in smaller and easier to read code. And I consider Robots a very small codebase (compare to Robocode's 2,200,000 lines of code) --[[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 15:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 2 February 2010
t "Got no status event! Dying now! :(" -- I love this quote =) » Nat | Talk » 23:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Haha, yes. That bit of code was from the rumble didn't check the version, but people used versions older than the recommended one anyway. I therefore used that to ensure my bot got 0 score on those clients, and thus had the bad result rejected by the rumble server. I should probably remove that hack since the rumble server now checks versions, AND doesn't ignore 0 results. --Rednaxela 00:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Please update. My current robot base (framework) use a lot of design from yours. Thanks a lot for sharing anyway =P --Nat Pavasant 14:48, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
The current changes are fairly minor really. I think I'm going to re-engineer the framework a bit before I updating here actually. There are a few aspects I'm somewhat unsatisfied with. For one thing, I'm considering setting up a framework for bot components based around dependency injection (perhaps using picocontainer) --Rednaxela 15:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Isn't Robocode blocked the use of Reflection which is the heart of PicoContainter? I'm not really sure it will work. But funny thing is that we need not to attach any dependency to a robot =) But from what I have read about DI, if one's codebase is not large and complicated, using no DI will result in smaller and easier to read code. And I consider Robots a very small codebase (compare to Robocode's 2,200,000 lines of code) --Nat Pavasant 15:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
