Difference between revisions of "ShieldBot/Version History"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (fix) |
m (fix) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** '''{{SimpleStats|link=http://literumble.appspot.com/BotDetails?game=roborumble&name=aaa.ShieldBot%200.012e|rumble=RoboRumble|scorelabel=APS|score=54.17|rank=499th|win=652|loss=503|plrank=474th|glicko2=N/A|pwin=56.45|vote=12.68|anpp=55.94|score2label=Survival|score2=64.15}}''' | ** '''{{SimpleStats|link=http://literumble.appspot.com/BotDetails?game=roborumble&name=aaa.ShieldBot%200.012e|rumble=RoboRumble|scorelabel=APS|score=54.17|rank=499th|win=652|loss=503|plrank=474th|glicko2=N/A|pwin=56.45|vote=12.68|anpp=55.94|score2label=Survival|score2=64.15}}''' | ||
** probably the best shielder ever. It ranks '''No.2 in vote''', which is 12.68%. In comparison, DrussGT's vote is 14.54%. EnergyDome's vote used to be 10.17%, but now it decreased to 4.78%. | ** probably the best shielder ever. It ranks '''No.2 in vote''', which is 12.68%. In comparison, DrussGT's vote is 14.54%. EnergyDome's vote used to be 10.17%, but now it decreased to 4.78%. | ||
| − | ** note the APS is lower than EnergyDome, because it would fire at SittingDuck like bot at all (where EnergyDome is treating energy drain as bullets and fire at "them") | + | ** note the APS is lower than EnergyDome, because it would NOT fire at SittingDuck like bot at all (where EnergyDome is treating energy drain as bullets and fire at "them") |
Revision as of 20:29, 3 September 2017
- ShieldBot Sub-pages:
- ShieldBot - Version History - Understanding ShieldBot
- 0.012e – 2017-08-31
- RoboRumble ‒ APS: 54.17% (499th)
- probably the best shielder ever. It ranks No.2 in vote, which is 12.68%. In comparison, DrussGT's vote is 14.54%. EnergyDome's vote used to be 10.17%, but now it decreased to 4.78%.
- note the APS is lower than EnergyDome, because it would NOT fire at SittingDuck like bot at all (where EnergyDome is treating energy drain as bullets and fire at "them")
