|
|
| (164 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == Does robo rumble work? ==
| + | For old discussion, see [[Archived talk:Main Page 20110903]]. |
| − | hi im new to robocode, been doing it as part of my uni course and i was wondering, is it possible to run roborumble at home anymore because ive follwed the instructions and none of the battles ive been doing have been uploading.... [[User:Quietus|Quietus]] 15:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Yep! It sure as he heck still works! The thing is, the rumble.fervir.com server has been kind of broken for a while. You need to point your client at [http://darkcanuck.net/rumble/ this URL] instead now (See [[Darkcanuck/RRServer|here]] for more information). There's new fanciness in that server too :) --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 19:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Article count ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | A couple questions about the article count (after having some trouble Googling for answers). First, why isn't it updating automatically? Is that something I can trigger to update, or add to the "job queue", does anyone know? (Notice if you edit / preview it is higher than 43, which it reads on the main page right now.) Second, what qualifies as an "article"? Is there a minimum length that a page needs to be (other than not being a user or talk page) to qualify as an article? --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 19:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | :The main page just updated, it now says 48 articles. Also, the statistics page says that there are 145 pages total, but it is excluding, "talk pages, pages about RoboWiki, minimal 'stub' pages, redirects, and others that probably don't qualify as content pages." --[[User:AaronR|AaronR]] 20:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | According to the MediaWiki wiki (now that's a mouthful), the main page will come up to date as soon as its HTML cache is invalidated, at which point all of the templates, etc. will be transcluded again. Don't know if that helps... --[[User:AaronR|AaronR]] 20:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Font size ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Just out of curiosity, why is the font size so large here compared to, say, Wikipedia? I know, I know, it's the same as the old wiki's font, but that wiki didn't have a sidebar. --[[User:AaronR|AaronR]] 07:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | : Primarily because I thought "x-small" was just too small, and yes, it was also just sooo much smaller than the old wiki. I also figured that with the skins options, we could easily give people more choices to choose their own style, anyway. I will confess that tiny fonts for the sake of sleeker designs is a major pet peeve of mine. :-P --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 07:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Smileys :-) ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I would be relly nice if we could somehow support smile, e.g. just as simple as stating:
| |
| − | | |
| − | <pre>[[Image:HappySmiley.png]]</pre>
| |
| − | | |
| − | --[[User:FlemmingLarsen|Flemming N. Larsen]] 09:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Wikimedia Commons has a [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Smiley whole section] of GFDL'd or public domain smileys (look at the link at the bottom for more). I don't really see the point though. If you want to upload them and use them, feel free, but I'll stick with =) on the wiki. --<code>[[User:AaronR|AaronR]]</code> 01:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Maths Markup ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Is it possible to turn on the math rendering like on Wikipedia? Sometimes, a properly rendered maths formula is easier to understand than the java code implementing it.
| |
| − | | |
| − | For example, have a look at some of the non-java code on the [[Circular_Targeting/Walkthrough|Circular Targeting Walkthrough]]. Now imagine how less understandable it would be without the sigmas and integral signs. Currently, they are just off-site images. This is not ideal--if the images get moved/deleted, the page would break. | |
| − | --[[User:Duyn|Duyn]] 05:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Old wiki ==
| |
| − | The old wiki is not working (error 500), and so my roborumble client (it cannot find the list of partecipants), but i see many client is uploading. What is your solution?
| |
| − | --[[User:Lestofante|Lestofante]] 10:35, 1 Dic 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | The clients currently running are just using the last copy of the participants list they downloaded from the old wiki. I emailed PEZ a bit ago and got a reply that he'll look into it so hopefully the old wiki will be up again in not too long. If that ends up taking longer than expected though, we could update/fix the participants page on the new wiki and point clients at that instead. (Note: Don't point clients at the one on the new wiki just yet, it's out of date and such. It needs to be copied over from a downloaded copy of the list from the old wiki) --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 12:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | maybe we can drop definitely the old wiki for roborumble client, or better every ramble server can implements it's own participants list, maybe integrated with general wiki list
| |
| − | --[[User:Lestofante|Lestofante]] 15:13, 1 Dic 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | I'd agree that migrating to using the new wiki participants list would be good, though I think some more veteran wikiers/rumblers than myself should give their input before any such switch is made 'official'. As far as keeping a participants list with the rumble server, well, there's only one working rumble server at the moment so I'm not sure what good that would do, and furthermore multiple rumble server would be a bad thing I think becacuse it would divide the processing power that goes towards making the battles. --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 17:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | That's right, then I thing the server have to had a mirror of the wiki's official participants list, so in this case we can continue run our client, simple we cannot modify the list (if the two list are not synchronize together)
| |
| − | --[[User:Lestofante|Lestofante]] 21:49, 1 Dic 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Yeah, the real problem is getting the participants list from the currently-erroring wiki. The RR client has no problem parsing the new wiki format. I may be able to get that from the RoboWiki server when I get home (if it isn't fixed before then).
| |
| − | | |
| − | The other issue we might encounter in the future would be when we move this wiki to robowiki.net, and we have RR clients pointing to testwiki.roborumble.org, but I don't think forwarding that URL and/or having people update their clients would be a big issue. I'm glad you contacted PEZ about the old wiki's current problems, I've been out of touch for at least a week...
| |
| − | | |
| − | --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 19:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Okay to mention it here as well for people who haven't been checking up on it... The old wiki is back up! --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 18:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == mailer error ==
| |
| − | I'm trying to confirm my user e-mail, but I still get "mailer error". I've tried 3 different and working address... and there is a way for automatically sign the edits?
| |
| − | --[[User:Lestofante|Lestofante]] 22:00, 1 Dic 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | : I couldn't get the mailer to work either, but you can easily sign your edits using <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki>. See http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cheatsheet for more tricks. --[[User:Darkcanuck|Darkcanuck]] 03:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == InterWiki Links ==
| |
| − | Who have fully access to this server apart from [[David Alves]]? I want both my thai wiki and this wiki a inter-languages link. Please look [[User_talk:Nat#New_Thai_RoboWiki|here]] for more detailed. » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 15:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
